| » Forum Index » The Friday Challenge » Topic: Challenge 669: Extinction local lingerie |
|
Posted on 25/08/17 09:06:26 AM |
|
Steve Caplin
Administrator Posts: 6835 Reply  |
Challenge 669: Extinction local lingerie
I saw this curious sign over a hatch in the wall as I was loading my car onto the cross channel ferry to go to France: Extinction Local Lingerie. What on earth can it mean? High res is here.  |
Posted on 25/08/17 11:23:37 AM |
|
DavidMac
Director of Photoshop Posts: 4936 Reply  |
Re: Challenge 669: Extinction local lingerie
I take it you know what it really means Steve? But I think it's more fun not to give the game away .......... _________________ The subtlety and conviction of any Photoshop effect is invariably inversely proportional to the number of knobs on it ....... |
Posted on 25/08/17 12:40:16 PM |
|
Frank
Eager Beaver Posts: 1576 Reply  |
Re: Challenge 669: Extinction local lingerie
A Ben Mills special:  |
Posted on 25/08/17 2:37:29 PM |
|
Ben Mills
Luminous Luminary Posts: 570 Reply  |
Re: Challenge 669: Extinction local lingerie
Nice one Frank.  |
Posted on 25/08/17 5:47:28 PM |
|
DavidMac
Director of Photoshop Posts: 4936 Reply |
Local Lingerie Extinction
Glad someone else did a naughty one first! Same idea basically but I'm not going start all over again because of that.  _________________ The subtlety and conviction of any Photoshop effect is invariably inversely proportional to the number of knobs on it ....... |
Posted on 25/08/17 6:03:30 PM |
|
Ben Mills
Luminous Luminary Posts: 570 Reply |
Re: Challenge 669: Extinction local lingerie
David, Another fine interpretation … excellent.  |
Posted on 25/08/17 6:52:07 PM |
|
michael sinclair
Off-Topic Opportunist Posts: 1752 Reply  |
Re: Challenge 669: Extinction local lingerie
I don't get this: I'll be off-topic this week! 
Hopefully, back to normal for next week 
 |
Posted on 26/08/17 4:16:48 PM |
|
josephine harvatt
Gag Gadgeteer Posts: 2596 Reply  |
Re: Challenge 669: Extinction local lingerie
"And it was this bigly"  _________________ I'm not really bad - I just draw that way |
Posted on 26/08/17 8:29:39 PM |
|
GKB
Magical Montagist Posts: 3723 Reply  |
Re: Challenge 669: Extinction local lingerie
... except that nobody seems to be putting out the fire _________________ If at first you don't succeed then skydiving is not for you. |
Posted on 27/08/17 07:14:18 AM |
|
DavidMac
Director of Photoshop Posts: 4936 Reply |
Re: Challenge 669: Extinction local lingerie
Liar, liar, pants on fire! _________________ The subtlety and conviction of any Photoshop effect is invariably inversely proportional to the number of knobs on it ....... |
Posted on 27/08/17 10:23:06 AM |
|
josephine harvatt
Gag Gadgeteer Posts: 2596 Reply |
Re: Challenge 669: Extinction local lingerie
It is an eternal flame _________________ I'm not really bad - I just draw that way |
Posted on 27/08/17 10:23:07 AM |
|
josephine harvatt
Gag Gadgeteer Posts: 2596 Reply |
Re: Challenge 669: Extinction local lingerie
. _________________ I'm not really bad - I just draw that way |
Posted on 29/08/17 3:08:22 PM |
|
Ant Snell
Specular Specialist Posts: 496 Reply  |
Re: Challenge 669: Extinction local lingerie
 |
Posted on 31/08/17 05:30:59 AM |
|
srawland
Pixel Perfectionist Posts: 885 Reply  |
Re: Challenge 669: Extinction local lingerie
I know the still image doesn't make a lick of sense unless you watch the animation: http://vimeo.com/231814496 I wanted to do so much more with this but Photoshop really limits the kinds of transformations you can use and they don't allow you to rotate 3D objects. The way I have done it in the past was to make a frame animation and render it to the video. I know that technically I have another day, but it's supposed to be 40 C here tomorrow and 43 C on Friday. I'm keeping my computer turned off to protect it until the heat wave passes. Like a lot of people around here I don't have air conditioning because, until recently, it didn't get that hot here.  _________________ I'm still learning. |
Posted on 31/08/17 10:39:54 AM |
|
Mariner
Renaissance Mariner Posts: 2817 Reply  |
No, I don't like the floor either.
|
Posted on 31/08/17 11:09:44 AM |
|
josephine harvatt
Gag Gadgeteer Posts: 2596 Reply |
Re: Challenge 669: Extinction local lingerie
I think you did really well given the limitations! Stay cool and drink lots of water! _________________ I'm not really bad - I just draw that way |
Posted on 31/08/17 12:05:32 PM |
|
Gerard
Digital Dutchman Posts: 145 Reply  |
Re: Challenge 669: Extinction local lingerie
Try to understand the text on the wall but I am lost! Steve will know! I think...  |
Posted on 31/08/17 7:10:57 PM |
|
Jota120
Ingenious Inventor Posts: 2615 Reply  |
Re: Challenge 669: Extinction local lingerie
 |
Posted on 31/08/17 7:13:10 PM |
|
Jota120
Ingenious Inventor Posts: 2615 Reply |
Re: Challenge 669: Extinction local lingerie
Triple expansion steam engine. Same design and size as used on RMS Titanic x2. In motion here, but only 15rpm . |
Posted on 31/08/17 9:02:37 PM |
|
Jota120
Ingenious Inventor Posts: 2615 Reply |
Re: Challenge 669: Extinction local lingerie
That's hot Sara!! Oh dear. Photoshop supports 3D rotations, but not sure it meets your needs/acceptable with transformations. Steve maybe able to point to one of his videos. My Photoshop 3D manipulation is limited. |
| page: 1 2 last |