| » Forum Index » The Friday Challenge » Topic: Challenge 1051: Inflatable wings |
|
Posted on 28/04/25 1:41:01 PM |
|
lwc
Hole in One Posts: 3121 Reply  |
Re: Challenge 1051: Inflatable wings
David your posting button has run amok... 
The cheeks was a static image, I simply added the wings and the animations... thanks! |
Posted on 28/04/25 1:42:33 PM |
|
lwc
Hole in One Posts: 3121 Reply |
Re: Challenge 1051: Inflatable wings
What could possibly go wrong...? 
 |
Posted on 28/04/25 4:34:32 PM |
|
GKB
Magical Montagist Posts: 3970 Reply  |
Re: Challenge 1051: Inflatable wings
Loyd, you just revived a part of my growing up. Something that I appear to have failed to complete I'm happy to say. Love the Acme wings ... as you say 'what could possibly go wrong?' Some very good and silly images this week. Keep it up everyone
I started this image earlier today. Not entirely happy with it but must finish now. Beep, Beep. 
_________________ Why is it that all the contestants in the ‘Miss Universe’ contest are all from Earth? |
Posted on 28/04/25 4:48:11 PM |
|
lwc
Hole in One Posts: 3121 Reply |
Re: Challenge 1051: Inflatable wings
Growing up is for old fogies Gordon... you've got the Rolls down, now you need to make a badge for the Bentley.  |
Posted on 28/04/25 5:11:53 PM |
|
DavidMac
Director of Photoshop Posts: 5551 Reply  |
Re: Challenge 1051: Inflatable wings
Fingers crossed this will post properly ........  _________________ The subtlety and conviction of any Photoshop effect is invariably inversely proportional to the number of knobs on it ....... |
Posted on 28/04/25 11:43:33 PM |
|
lwc
Hole in One Posts: 3121 Reply |
Re: Challenge 1051: Inflatable wings
Yikes! That's a hard act to follow DavidMac. |
Posted on 29/04/25 00:18:24 AM |
|
lwc
Hole in One Posts: 3121 Reply |
Re: Challenge 1051: Inflatable wings
|
Posted on 29/04/25 11:49:23 AM |
|
GKB
Magical Montagist Posts: 3970 Reply |
Re: Challenge 1051: Inflatable wings
Happier with this version  _________________ Whatever you do in life do it with the enthusiasm of a 4-year old in a Batman suit. |
Posted on 29/04/25 12:40:45 PM |
|
DavidMac
Director of Photoshop Posts: 5551 Reply |
Re: Challenge 1051: Inflatable wings
Yes. Much better. Pop out to the garage for a quick snap did you? _________________ The subtlety and conviction of any Photoshop effect is invariably inversely proportional to the number of knobs on it ....... |
Posted on 29/04/25 1:59:12 PM |
|
GKB
Magical Montagist Posts: 3970 Reply |
Re: Challenge 1051: Inflatable wings
It was my chauffeur’s day off so I had to get the butler to take the shot. Unfortunately he shot the wrong Rolls. In the end I had to send my private jet to Barbados to collect David Bailey from my villa where he was holidaying to take the shot. This time I made sure that he knew it was the Rolls fourth from the right … the one with the red Lamborghini in front, not the white one🤣 _________________ Have you ever noticed that all the instruments designed to detect intelligent life are pointing away from the Earth? |
Posted on 29/04/25 2:52:38 PM |
|
lwc
Hole in One Posts: 3121 Reply |
Re: Challenge 1051: Inflatable wings
We know the truth Gordon, the Bentley was in the shop and you had to use the Rolls. |
Posted on 29/04/25 2:53:54 PM |
|
lwc
Hole in One Posts: 3121 Reply |
Re: Challenge 1051: Inflatable wings
Just when you thought the Paris Fashion show couldn’t get more outrageous. 
|
Posted on 30/04/25 11:37:54 AM |
|
DavidMac
Director of Photoshop Posts: 5551 Reply |
Re: Challenge 1051: Inflatable wings
Just can't trust the help nowadays ......... _________________ The subtlety and conviction of any Photoshop effect is invariably inversely proportional to the number of knobs on it ....... |
Posted on 30/04/25 2:48:27 PM |
|
lwc
Hole in One Posts: 3121 Reply |
Re: Challenge 1051: Inflatable wings
Not something entirely new, the multi-colored wing concept has been a fascination for the Dutch for ages. 
|
Posted on 30/04/25 5:28:49 PM |
|
michael sinclair
Off-Topic Opportunist Posts: 1853 Reply  |
Re: Challenge 1051: Inflatable wings
Horrendously time consuming. It needs more than 55 frames shown here, but you at least get a taste of a real waving flag.
 |
Posted on 30/04/25 7:15:39 PM |
|
Ant Snell
Specular Specialist Posts: 557 Reply  |
Re: Challenge 1051: Inflatable wings
Sorry, but I don't think I will have time this week (jury service). |
Posted on 01/05/25 11:17:04 AM |
|
DavidMac
Director of Photoshop Posts: 5551 Reply |
Re: Challenge 1051: Inflatable wings
Hope it's an interesting one. _________________ The subtlety and conviction of any Photoshop effect is invariably inversely proportional to the number of knobs on it ....... |
Posted on 01/05/25 1:07:21 PM |
|
michael sinclair
Off-Topic Opportunist Posts: 1853 Reply |
Re: Challenge 1051: Inflatable wings
The Aurora Borealis
 |
Posted on 01/05/25 1:34:59 PM |
|
DavidMac
Director of Photoshop Posts: 5551 Reply |
Re: Challenge 1051: Inflatable wings
Michael I am truly a little puzzled by this. " .... the taste of a real waving flag". The flag is a white flag on green screen animation into which you have embedded the colours. I appreciate that 55 frames must indeed have been very time consuming. I also appreciate that to attempt to animate the colours to follow the folds and changing shape would be a gargantuan task far too difficult to even contemplate but, as it is, the self evidently static colours serve only to diminish and inhibit the "taste of a real waving flag". My puzzlement is that you have obviously put a lot of work and effort into this but I can't quite grasp why. I keep asking myself "Why did he choose to do something so insanely difficult and unachievable?" _________________ The subtlety and conviction of any Photoshop effect is invariably inversely proportional to the number of knobs on it ....... |
Posted on 01/05/25 1:38:20 PM |
|
DavidMac
Director of Photoshop Posts: 5551 Reply |
Re: Challenge 1051: Inflatable wings
This just came in as I was in the middle of posting my earlier comment. Works much better! _________________ The subtlety and conviction of any Photoshop effect is invariably inversely proportional to the number of knobs on it ....... |
| page: 1 2 3 4 last |