This week's banner is by lwc from Oklahoma, USA

The Friday Challenge
Back to the book | Post New Topic | Search | Help | Log In | Register

» Forum Index » The Friday Challenge » Topic: Challenge 1106: Space at the Saatchi

Posted on 29/05/26 11:13:41 AM
dwindt
Realism Realiser
Posts: 1084

Reply
Re: Challenge 1106: Space at the Saatchi
Mariner wrote:
David wrote
Yo ho ho is missing. Tried in three different browsers. Same in all. Seems there's a dodgy link.


I am going to start painting anyway. I only need a title.

"Yo ho ho" Something to do with rum, pirates, Treasure Island?

I am sailing away with it!




Nah Mariner, it's an image of twin prostitutes...

_________________
The grass is greener on the other side of the fence because there is more $hit there.

Posted on 29/05/26 11:31:00 AM
lwc
Hole in One
Posts: 3545

Reply


Re: Challenge 1106: Space at the Saatchi
Steve Caplin wrote:
Do watch the perspective on that llama, though: it’s clearly shown by the railing and the top of the the door:


I tried the photo in several different perspectives and finally decided that the bottom of the photo would follow the baseboard of the wall and not the railing since the railing would be four or five feet closer to the camera (too much over-thinking I guess)… with that said, your version is more visually appealing. An alpaca not llama. Used one of my photos when he was dressed up for Halloween.



Thanks Steve!





Posted on 29/05/26 11:57:45 AM
Mariner
Renaissance Mariner
Posts: 3340

Reply


Re: Challenge 1106: Space at the Saatchi
dwindt wrote:
Mariner wrote:
David wrote
Yo ho ho is missing. Tried in three different browsers. Same in all. Seems there's a dodgy link.


I am going to start painting anyway. I only need a title.

"Yo ho ho" Something to do with rum, pirates, Treasure Island?

I am sailing away with it!




Nah Mariner, it's an image of twin prostitutes...


Dennis please explain.


Posted on 29/05/26 12:10:00 PM
Steve Caplin
Administrator
Posts: 7174

Reply


Re: Challenge 1106: Space at the Saatchi
Mariner wrote:

This week for the first time I saw a picture of her tent, showing how many men she had slept with. Was she ashamed? Don't know. Boasting? Who cares?



And that’s exactly what I mean. You can’t judge a three-dimensional work of art from a photograph, or a description. Having been inside the tent and experienced it as it was meant to be, I can confirm that it was a surprisingly moving experience: part refuge, part confession, but suffused with emotional honesty.


After viewing pictures and sculpptures by the Chapman brothers I decided that some of them seemed to be bordering on deformed child pornography and one of them was a construct of four girls waving to form the arms of a swastika. What did you think of that one Steve?



I know the work you’re referring to, it’s part of a huge and detailed set of four displays that show Nazi soldiers being persecuted by devils, in a variety of imaginative and frequently disturbing ways. Again, this is what I mean be experiencing a work of art rather than reading about it, or seeing photos of a single detail. Yes, it is disturbing. That’s the point. It questions our view of hell, of retribution, of justice itself. It’s not supposed to be easy viewing. Sadly, this work was destroyed by fire some years ago.


There are many beautiful woks of art in the world. I would like to see more of them. If it were ugliness I desired then I would just take a look at the real world around me or listen to the latest news.



Well that’s a fair point, of course. But art was never supposed to be pretty. I assume you aren’t a fan of Bosch. But what about Picasso’s Guernica, to take a single more modern example? It still has the power to shock, nearly a century later.

Art since the surrealist and dada movements have been about challenging our perceptions, even if that means shocking the viewer. And as audiences have become more inured to shocking images, so the artists have to try harder to produce a reaction.

I’m not trying to tell you what art you should and should not enjoy looking at. But I am suggesting you don’t dismiss works that repel or shock you: that’s their intention.

Many years ago I used to visit the Tate Gallery (now Tate Britain), and particularly enjoyed the surrealist works. Hanging over the stairs was Stanley Spencer’s The Resurrection, Cookham, a painting I found so disturbing I would literally avert my gaze as I walked past it. Years later I wondered how this painting could have produced such a profound emotional reaction in me: now, when I visit the Tate, it’s always the picture I spend the most time with.

Posted on 29/05/26 1:00:41 PM
dwindt
Realism Realiser
Posts: 1084

Reply
Re: Challenge 1106: Space at the Saatchi
Mariner wrote:
dwindt wrote:
Mariner wrote:
David wrote
Yo ho ho is missing. Tried in three different browsers. Same in all. Seems there's a dodgy link.


I am going to start painting anyway. I only need a title.

"Yo ho ho" Something to do with rum, pirates, Treasure Island?

I am sailing away with it!




Nah Mariner, it's an image of twin prostitutes...


Dennis please explain.



"Yo ho." Slang for 'hello 'hoe...or whore,"...therefore...Yo ho ho....greeting twin prostitutes...artists licence...lol.


_________________
The grass is greener on the other side of the fence because there is more $hit there.

Posted on 29/05/26 1:10:08 PM
Frank
Eager Beaver
Posts: 1876

Reply


Re: Challenge 1106: Space at the Saatchi
Thanks Steve, after about three days of contemplation that idea popped into my head - ( maybe they'll give you a spot) - love your site and works and love your Group "Bedlam"


Posted on 29/05/26 1:14:24 PM
dwindt
Realism Realiser
Posts: 1084

Reply
Re: Challenge 1106: Space at the Saatchi
Perspective corrected. Much better. Thank you Steve!



_________________
The grass is greener on the other side of the fence because there is more $hit there.

Posted on 29/05/26 1:16:37 PM
dwindt
Realism Realiser
Posts: 1084

Reply
Re: Challenge 1106: Space at the Saatchi
and then I failed to repair the balcony railing shadow across the 2nd bottom right painting...lol.

_________________
The grass is greener on the other side of the fence because there is more $hit there.

Posted on 29/05/26 2:57:14 PM
Mariner
Renaissance Mariner
Posts: 3340

Reply


Re: Challenge 1106: Space at the Saatchi
Thanks, Steve, for your lengthy and illiuminating reply.
page: 1 2 3 4 last
Back

[ To post a reply, please Log In or Register ]

Powered by SimpleForum Pro 4.6